<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media: Too Much Noise, Needs Filter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:43:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amidtgaard</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>amidtgaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2435</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the title. I had this discussion with early-apodters who say that get so much good info from microblogging, I come from the Search Industry and find that it takes too much of my time to get to the point. As inspiration some times it is interesting but it still can&#039;t compete with your targeted Google search.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we think a bit beyond social media and rather about how we get relevant and interesting information in the future, filtering is essential. I am sure some of the big guys are moving on this as we speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the title. I had this discussion with early-apodters who say that get so much good info from microblogging, I come from the Search Industry and find that it takes too much of my time to get to the point. As inspiration some times it is interesting but it still can&#39;t compete with your targeted Google search.</p>
<p>If we think a bit beyond social media and rather about how we get relevant and interesting information in the future, filtering is essential. I am sure some of the big guys are moving on this as we speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amidtgaard</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-6860</link>
		<dc:creator>amidtgaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-6860</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the title. I had this discussion with early-apodters who say that get so much good info from microblogging, I come from the Search Industry and find that it takes too much of my time to get to the point. As inspiration some times it is interesting but it still can&#039;t compete with your targeted Google search.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we think a bit beyond social media and rather about how we get relevant and interesting information in the future, filtering is essential. I am sure some of the big guys are moving on this as we speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the title. I had this discussion with early-apodters who say that get so much good info from microblogging, I come from the Search Industry and find that it takes too much of my time to get to the point. As inspiration some times it is interesting but it still can&#39;t compete with your targeted Google search.</p>
<p>If we think a bit beyond social media and rather about how we get relevant and interesting information in the future, filtering is essential. I am sure some of the big guys are moving on this as we speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italian Restaurant</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2434</link>
		<dc:creator>Italian Restaurant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2434</guid>
		<description>Can it be filtered ? How do they go about doing it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can it be filtered ? How do they go about doing it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2425</link>
		<dc:creator>dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2425</guid>
		<description>Hi, fully agreed.

Filtering in the context of &quot;social media&quot; is actually twofolds: filtering &quot;who you listen to&quot; and filtering &quot;what you&#039;re interested in&quot;.

That&#039;s very different from traditional &quot;keyword filtering&quot; we&#039;ve been used to in Google.

One paradigm shift is that people have to depart from the idea of knowing everything towards focusing on the things that matter and actually manage their time &amp; attention as a limited and high value ressource.

We monitor, listen and engage as a team a large number of blogs in social media (that&#039;s how I got this post) and although there is still improvements down the road, we&#039;ve made huge productivity gains in listening &amp; engaging with the larger social media community:

http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-600-blogs-on-social-media-marketing/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, fully agreed.</p>
<p>Filtering in the context of &#8220;social media&#8221; is actually twofolds: filtering &#8220;who you listen to&#8221; and filtering &#8220;what you&#8217;re interested in&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s very different from traditional &#8220;keyword filtering&#8221; we&#8217;ve been used to in Google.</p>
<p>One paradigm shift is that people have to depart from the idea of knowing everything towards focusing on the things that matter and actually manage their time &amp; attention as a limited and high value ressource.</p>
<p>We monitor, listen and engage as a team a large number of blogs in social media (that&#8217;s how I got this post) and although there is still improvements down the road, we&#8217;ve made huge productivity gains in listening &amp; engaging with the larger social media community:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-600-blogs-on-social-media-marketing/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-600-blogs-on-social-media-marketing/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>Hi, fully agreed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Filtering in the context of &quot;social media&quot; is actually twofolds: filtering &quot;who you listen to&quot; and filtering &quot;what you&#039;re interested in&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s very different from traditional &quot;keyword filtering&quot; we&#039;ve been used to in Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One paradigm shift is that people have to depart from the idea of knowing everything towards focusing on the things that matter and actually manage their time &amp; attention as a limited and high value ressource.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We monitor, listen and engage as a team a large number of blogs in social media (that&#039;s how I got this post) and although there is still improvements down the road, we&#039;ve made huge productivity gains in listening &amp; engaging with the larger social media community:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-600-blogs-on-social-media-marketing/&quot;&gt;http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-60...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, fully agreed.</p>
<p>Filtering in the context of &#8220;social media&#8221; is actually twofolds: filtering &#8220;who you listen to&#8221; and filtering &#8220;what you&#39;re interested in&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#39;s very different from traditional &#8220;keyword filtering&#8221; we&#39;ve been used to in Google.</p>
<p>One paradigm shift is that people have to depart from the idea of knowing everything towards focusing on the things that matter and actually manage their time &amp; attention as a limited and high value ressource.</p>
<p>We monitor, listen and engage as a team a large number of blogs in social media (that&#39;s how I got this post) and although there is still improvements down the road, we&#39;ve made huge productivity gains in listening &amp; engaging with the larger social media community:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-600-blogs-on-social-media-marketing/"></a><a href="http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-60.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-60..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendFeed Adds Filtering - Covering All That's Social On the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2424</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendFeed Adds Filtering - Covering All That's Social On the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2424</guid>
		<description>[...] that help users find the best posts from within your feed. Just yesterday I wrote about how social media needs filter and this is clearly a step in that direction. Facebook is currently the only other site that I know [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that help users find the best posts from within your feed. Just yesterday I wrote about how social media needs filter and this is clearly a step in that direction. Facebook is currently the only other site that I know [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-6859</link>
		<dc:creator>dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-6859</guid>
		<description>Hi, fully agreed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Filtering in the context of &quot;social media&quot; is actually twofolds: filtering &quot;who you listen to&quot; and filtering &quot;what you&#039;re interested in&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s very different from traditional &quot;keyword filtering&quot; we&#039;ve been used to in Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One paradigm shift is that people have to depart from the idea of knowing everything towards focusing on the things that matter and actually manage their time &amp; attention as a limited and high value ressource.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We monitor, listen and engage as a team a large number of blogs in social media (that&#039;s how I got this post) and although there is still improvements down the road, we&#039;ve made huge productivity gains in listening &amp; engaging with the larger social media community:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-600-blogs-on-social-media-marketing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-60...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, fully agreed.</p>
<p>Filtering in the context of &#8220;social media&#8221; is actually twofolds: filtering &#8220;who you listen to&#8221; and filtering &#8220;what you&#39;re interested in&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#39;s very different from traditional &#8220;keyword filtering&#8221; we&#39;ve been used to in Google.</p>
<p>One paradigm shift is that people have to depart from the idea of knowing everything towards focusing on the things that matter and actually manage their time &amp; attention as a limited and high value ressource.</p>
<p>We monitor, listen and engage as a team a large number of blogs in social media (that&#39;s how I got this post) and although there is still improvements down the road, we&#39;ve made huge productivity gains in listening &amp; engaging with the larger social media community:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-600-blogs-on-social-media-marketing/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-60.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.ecairn.com/2008/05/29/monitoring-60..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2426</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2426</guid>
		<description>Well, I agree that filtering through social media can be tricky. Unfortunately I don&#039;t really have a problem with it.
More to the point, thanks for introducing me to Plurk. =P I find it far more intuitive than Twitter. It has an awesome personality...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I agree that filtering through social media can be tricky. Unfortunately I don&#8217;t really have a problem with it.<br />
More to the point, thanks for introducing me to Plurk. =P I find it far more intuitive than Twitter. It has an awesome personality&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>Well, I agree that filtering through social media can be tricky. Unfortunately I don&#039;t really have a problem with it.&lt;br&gt;More to the point, thanks for introducing me to Plurk. =P I find it far more intuitive than Twitter. It has an awesome personality...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I agree that filtering through social media can be tricky. Unfortunately I don&#39;t really have a problem with it.<br />More to the point, thanks for introducing me to Plurk. =P I find it far more intuitive than Twitter. It has an awesome personality&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Parr</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/social-media-too-much-noise-needs-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=535#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>Nobody needs to create any such service to filter the noise.

Why?

Because so very, very few need a filter for the noise in the first place.

Think: how many people have a Facebook, Twitter, FriendFeed, and use a blog reader?  Hell, how many have Facebook and any one of these other services?

An incredible few.  The general public isn&#039;t overloaded with information, and it&#039;s not really economical for someone to develop a technology and a business to filter all of these services when none of these services are mainstream, minus Facebook.

The demand is just not there, not yet at least.  We&#039;re just the crazy early adopters who have taken it upon ourselves to get immersed in the noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody needs to create any such service to filter the noise.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because so very, very few need a filter for the noise in the first place.</p>
<p>Think: how many people have a Facebook, Twitter, FriendFeed, and use a blog reader?  Hell, how many have Facebook and any one of these other services?</p>
<p>An incredible few.  The general public isn&#8217;t overloaded with information, and it&#8217;s not really economical for someone to develop a technology and a business to filter all of these services when none of these services are mainstream, minus Facebook.</p>
<p>The demand is just not there, not yet at least.  We&#8217;re just the crazy early adopters who have taken it upon ourselves to get immersed in the noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
