<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Worth $1 Billion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/</link>
	<description>The Social Times covers news, analysis and insight pertaining to the social web.  Learn how to brand yourself and your company via the social web.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Singapore SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-6236</link>
		<dc:creator>Singapore SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-6236</guid>
		<description>I will be looking forward to a payment system using Twitter. That will be nice and interactive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be looking forward to a payment system using Twitter. That will be nice and interactive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parallel Import Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-6130</link>
		<dc:creator>Parallel Import Cars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-6130</guid>
		<description>It was around 150 Million in April. Then estimated 1 Billion in June. But with the current depression, they would be lucky to be worth 80 Million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was around 150 Million in April. Then estimated 1 Billion in June. But with the current depression, they would be lucky to be worth 80 Million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-6115</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-6115</guid>
		<description>Twitter is still going through funding meaning they&#39;re yet to be profitable yet. Just recovering the costs would be something that will take some time to achieve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is still going through funding meaning they&#39;re yet to be profitable yet. Just recovering the costs would be something that will take some time to achieve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Las Vegas Travel</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-5900</link>
		<dc:creator>Las Vegas Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-5900</guid>
		<description>It sounds really cool, although I&#39;d rather pick up my own beer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds really cool, although I&#39;d rather pick up my own beer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacNet</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-5899</link>
		<dc:creator>PacNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-5899</guid>
		<description>How viable is this idea? Is it safe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How viable is this idea? Is it safe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Racing Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-5835</link>
		<dc:creator>Racing Schools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 07:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-5835</guid>
		<description>How well it takes off is dependent on how much they charge for the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How well it takes off is dependent on how much they charge for the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Westheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-3821</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Westheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-3821</guid>
		<description>One of the smarter conclusions which has come out of the discussion about my post is the idea that PayPal wake up and build something on top of Twitter. I think the talk about Twitter's reliability is a valid one, but I state early in my post that the reliability issue is a constant for me. They either will or they won't fix things in the end. Clearly they can't proceed on any plan without fixing the most fundamental issues.

Good discussion though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the smarter conclusions which has come out of the discussion about my post is the idea that PayPal wake up and build something on top of Twitter. I think the talk about Twitter&#8217;s reliability is a valid one, but I state early in my post that the reliability issue is a constant for me. They either will or they won&#8217;t fix things in the end. Clearly they can&#8217;t proceed on any plan without fixing the most fundamental issues.</p>
<p>Good discussion though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Westheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Westheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>One of the smarter conclusions which has come out of the discussion about my post is the idea that PayPal wake up and build something on top of Twitter. I think the talk about Twitter&#39;s reliability is a valid one, but I state early in my post that the reliability issue is a constant for me. They either will or they won&#39;t fix things in the end. Clearly they can&#39;t proceed on any plan without fixing the most fundamental issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good discussion though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the smarter conclusions which has come out of the discussion about my post is the idea that PayPal wake up and build something on top of Twitter. I think the talk about Twitter&#39;s reliability is a valid one, but I state early in my post that the reliability issue is a constant for me. They either will or they won&#39;t fix things in the end. Clearly they can&#39;t proceed on any plan without fixing the most fundamental issues.</p>
<p>Good discussion though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcpatton</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-4434</link>
		<dc:creator>dcpatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-4434</guid>
		<description>I think you have a typo in there Nick. I believe it should be "p dcpatton $50".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a typo in there Nick. I believe it should be &#8220;p dcpatton $50&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcpatton</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator>dcpatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-3809</guid>
		<description>I think you have a typo in there Nick. I believe it should be "p dcpatton $50".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a typo in there Nick. I believe it should be &#8220;p dcpatton $50&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dangrsmind</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/is-twitter-worth-1-billion/#comment-3807</link>
		<dc:creator>dangrsmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=611#comment-3807</guid>
		<description>Nope.   Payment processing requires even more robust performance than Twitter's existing messaging/micro-blogging application.  You can't give people the fail whale when they are trying to buy something or pay a bill.  

Also Twitter would face competition from Facebook, PayPal (don't they essentially offer this already?), Google, etc.  In the end this would turn Twitter into an execution play, and they've already shown that they can't execute on various key aspects of their business, i.e. reliability and scalability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.   Payment processing requires even more robust performance than Twitter&#8217;s existing messaging/micro-blogging application.  You can&#8217;t give people the fail whale when they are trying to buy something or pay a bill.  </p>
<p>Also Twitter would face competition from Facebook, PayPal (don&#8217;t they essentially offer this already?), Google, etc.  In the end this would turn Twitter into an execution play, and they&#8217;ve already shown that they can&#8217;t execute on various key aspects of their business, i.e. reliability and scalability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
