<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iGoogle Getting Social, Adding FriendFeed Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/igoogle-getting-social-adding-friendfeed-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/igoogle-getting-social-adding-friendfeed-feature/</link>
	<description>The Social Times covers news, analysis and insight pertaining to the social web.  Learn how to brand yourself and your company via the social web.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stoltz</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/igoogle-getting-social-adding-friendfeed-feature/#comment-4849</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stoltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=603#comment-4849</guid>
		<description>Nick--I&#39;m not surprised to see Google going social off the iGoogle platform (Netvibes Ginger has been trying to go social for a while now, though it seems to be getting little traction). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it is surprising to see Google pull in content only from its own properties. I suspect this is an implementation issue at this point, and that ultimately iGoogle will pull in everything from everywhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And once again Google will have found a way to keep itself at the center of web users&#39; universe. Damn those folks are good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick&#8211;I&#39;m not surprised to see Google going social off the iGoogle platform (Netvibes Ginger has been trying to go social for a while now, though it seems to be getting little traction). </p>
<p>But it is surprising to see Google pull in content only from its own properties. I suspect this is an implementation issue at this point, and that ultimately iGoogle will pull in everything from everywhere.</p>
<p>And once again Google will have found a way to keep itself at the center of web users&#39; universe. Damn those folks are good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stoltz</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/06/igoogle-getting-social-adding-friendfeed-feature/#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stoltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=603#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>Nick--I'm not surprised to see Google going social off the iGoogle platform (Netvibes Ginger has been trying to go social for a while now, though it seems to be getting little traction). 

But it is surprising to see Google pull in content only from its own properties. I suspect this is an implementation issue at this point, and that ultimately iGoogle will pull in everything from everywhere.

And once again Google will have found a way to keep itself at the center of web users' universe. Damn those folks are good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick&#8211;I&#8217;m not surprised to see Google going social off the iGoogle platform (Netvibes Ginger has been trying to go social for a while now, though it seems to be getting little traction). </p>
<p>But it is surprising to see Google pull in content only from its own properties. I suspect this is an implementation issue at this point, and that ultimately iGoogle will pull in everything from everywhere.</p>
<p>And once again Google will have found a way to keep itself at the center of web users&#8217; universe. Damn those folks are good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
