<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking Sites: Dead in Two Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:36:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-12951</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-12951</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Nick , Although most social networks are still going strong, it appears that the overall market share of social networking sites is beginning to decrease ..meli</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re right Nick , Although most social networks are still going strong, it appears that the overall market share of social networking sites is beginning to decrease ..meli</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlmatos4735</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-11030</link>
		<dc:creator>rlmatos4735</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-11030</guid>
		<description>Social networks sites are bigger than ever. Dead in 2 years? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social networks sites are bigger than ever. Dead in 2 years? I don&#39;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenisi</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-10538</link>
		<dc:creator>lenisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-10538</guid>
		<description>social netrkng 4ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>social netrkng 4ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyceone</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-10395</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyceone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-10395</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s quite a brave prediction, it has good analysis.&lt;br&gt;thanks! From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rocketfrenchsecrets.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Learn how to speak French&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s quite a brave prediction, it has good analysis.<br />thanks! From <a href="http://www.rocketfrenchsecrets.com/" rel="nofollow">Learn how to speak French</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piya</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-10368</link>
		<dc:creator>Piya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-10368</guid>
		<description>Social networking sites are gaining importance day-by-day. It helps a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social networking sites are gaining importance day-by-day. It helps a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frd</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-10300</link>
		<dc:creator>Frd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-10300</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Kits</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Kits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-2094</guid>
		<description>Hate to say it, but I have to agree. Some social media sites are already making themselves appear dead with the pursuit of features that are not that crucial. Take Facebook for example, that&#039;s slowly turning into a quiz site and playground, and losing focus on the real values and results reaped from socializing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to say it, but I have to agree. Some social media sites are already making themselves appear dead with the pursuit of features that are not that crucial. Take Facebook for example, that&#39;s slowly turning into a quiz site and playground, and losing focus on the real values and results reaped from socializing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Kits</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-8354</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Kits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-8354</guid>
		<description>Hate to say it, but I have to agree. Some social media sites are already making themselves appear dead with the pursuit of features that are not that crucial. Take Facebook for example, that&#039;s slowly turning into a quiz site and playground, and losing focus on the real values and results reaped from socializing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to say it, but I have to agree. Some social media sites are already making themselves appear dead with the pursuit of features that are not that crucial. Take Facebook for example, that&#39;s slowly turning into a quiz site and playground, and losing focus on the real values and results reaped from socializing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-2092</guid>
		<description>You may be right. Actually there is a desktop social-network that is online right at this moment. Actually, you may be more than right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right. Actually there is a desktop social-network that is online right at this moment. Actually, you may be more than right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italian Restaurant</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-networking-sites-dead-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Italian Restaurant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=485#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>Two years seems too short for social networking . I think it can last longer than that since its becoming the trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years seems too short for social networking . I think it can last longer than that since its becoming the trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
