Comments on: Social Network Sites Are The Emperor’s New Clothes

By: edhardy11

edhardy11 — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:01:07 +0000

Doctor Cheap Ed Hardy hats what would Cheap Ed Hardy caps happen Cheap Ed Hardy Kids if we Cheap Ed Hardy Sunglasses waited Cheap Ed Hardy Bags an Cheap Ed Hardy SPECIALS hour Cheap Ed Hardy Belts or two Ed Hardy Tops Sale on a Ed Hardy Shoes Sale vaginal birth Ed Hardy Jeans Sale and Tiffany Key Ring head to Tiffany Set the Tiffany and co Charm operating Tiffany and co Bracelet roombut Cheap Links of London Earrings it shows Cheap Links of London Rings that Cheap Links of London Chain with the Cheap Links of London Pendants rising Csection Cheap Links of London sweetie rate now Cheap Links of London heart charm one in Cheap Links of London jewellery three babies Links of London Charms Sale is born Links of London Sweetie Bracelets Sale via Caesarean Links of London Sweetie Watches Sale wome

By: Italian Restaurant

Italian Restaurant — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:28:45 +0000

Thats an interesting description . But i think its quite appropriate. Thanks for sharing.

By: wholesaleclothing

wholesaleclothing — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:52:42 +0000

The post really nice , i like it ,thanks for sharing,thanks for your post, i will keep read your blog everyday
wholesale clothing
wholesale clothing distributors
wholesale Korean fashion

By: MJM

MJM — Tue, 20 May 2008 09:12:34 +0000

neil. won’t the basis of value change over time as “social networks” change?

won’t data portability enable growth opportunities (by lessening user friction) for new communities focused on specific interests, while creating pressure to maintain scale for large sites such as FB? creation. destruction. creation.

this debate reminds me of the first social network – AOL. as AOL gained traction there was a significant conversation around prospects for their “walled garden” versus the world wide web. we know who won that argument.

at the time, the issue of data portability came to the fore front with the IM. would AOl allow other IM’s (Yahoo for example or MSN Messenger) to interconnect? eventually consumers required it and AOL yielded….

if the large social networks don;t give users what they want, someone else will……..

By: MJM

MJM — Tue, 20 May 2008 09:12:34 +0000

neil. won't the basis of value change over time as "social networks" change?

won't data portability enable growth opportunities (by lessening user friction) for new communities focused on specific interests, while creating pressure to maintain scale for large sites such as FB? creation. destruction. creation.

this debate reminds me of the first social network - AOL. as AOL gained traction there was a significant conversation around prospects for their "walled garden" versus the world wide web. we know who won that argument.

at the time, the issue of data portability came to the fore front with the IM. would AOl allow other IM's (Yahoo for example or MSN Messenger) to interconnect? eventually consumers required it and AOL yielded....

if the large social networks don;t give users what they want, someone else will........

By: MJM

MJM — Tue, 20 May 2008 07:12:34 +0000

By: kady

kady — Mon, 19 May 2008 15:06:52 +0000

Great write up. I watched the video from dataportability.org, got the concept but don’t completely understand how it works. Interesting that when I googled data portability, dataportability.org is the first one on teh list. You’re right in that we will start to see more start-ups focusing on data portability.

By: kady

kady — Mon, 19 May 2008 15:06:52 +0000

Great write up. I watched the video from dataportability.org, got the concept but don't completely understand how it works. Interesting that when I googled data portability, dataportability.org is the first one on teh list. You're right in that we will start to see more start-ups focusing on data portability.

By: kady

kady — Mon, 19 May 2008 13:06:52 +0000