<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Apps Should Get You Laid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/</link>
	<description>The Social Times covers news, analysis and insight pertaining to the social web.  Learn how to brand yourself and your company via the social web.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dmitriy Kruglyak</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=503#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>Nick,

I think Facebook's entertainment slant comes from its origins and is self-reinforcing. Take a look at the chapter I submitted for the upcoming "Psychology of Facebook" book. IMHO, it addresses the questions you ask.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb

Plus, here is the site for the book, that is coming out of the sequel to the famous Stanford Facebook class:
http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com

Would love to hear you thoughts on the role of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>I think Facebook&#8217;s entertainment slant comes from its origins and is self-reinforcing. Take a look at the chapter I submitted for the upcoming &#8220;Psychology of Facebook&#8221; book. IMHO, it addresses the questions you ask.<br />
<a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb" rel="nofollow">http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb</a></p>
<p>Plus, here is the site for the book, that is coming out of the sequel to the famous Stanford Facebook class:<br />
<a href="http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com</a></p>
<p>Would love to hear you thoughts on the role of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitriy Kruglyak</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/05/social-apps-should-get-you-laid/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/?p=503#comment-4893</guid>
		<description>Nick,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Facebook&#39;s entertainment slant comes from its origins and is self-reinforcing. Take a look at the chapter I submitted for the upcoming "Psychology of Facebook" book. IMHO, it addresses the questions you ask.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb"&gt;http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, here is the site for the book, that is coming out of the sequel to the famous Stanford Facebook class:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com"&gt;http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would love to hear you thoughts on the role of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>I think Facebook&#39;s entertainment slant comes from its origins and is self-reinforcing. Take a look at the chapter I submitted for the upcoming &#8220;Psychology of Facebook&#8221; book. IMHO, it addresses the questions you ask.<br /><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb">http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb</a></p>
<p>Plus, here is the site for the book, that is coming out of the sequel to the famous Stanford Facebook class:<br /><a href="http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com">http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com</a></p>
<p>Would love to hear you thoughts on the role of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
