Comments on: Does Video Twitter Make Sense? http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/ Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:57:39 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jim http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1438 Jim Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:27:13 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-1438 I was at the http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/ conference and I bumped into Tom Boilard and he has created a photo Twitter application with http://moborazzi.com. I was at the http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/ conference and I bumped into Tom Boilard and he has created a photo Twitter application with http://moborazzi.com.

]]> By: Jim http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1439 Jim Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:27:13 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-1439 I was at the <a href="http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/">http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/</a> conference and I bumped into Tom Boilard and he has created a photo Twitter application with <a href="http://moborazzi.com">http://moborazzi.com</a>. I was at the http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/ conference and I bumped into Tom Boilard and he has created a photo Twitter application with http://moborazzi.com.

]]> By: Jim http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-7287 Jim Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:27:13 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-7287 I was at the <a href="http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/</a> conference and I bumped into Tom Boilard and he has created a photo Twitter application with <a href="http://moborazzi.com" rel="nofollow">http://moborazzi.com</a>. I was at the http://www.webinnovatorsgroup.com/ conference and I bumped into Tom Boilard and he has created a photo Twitter application with http://moborazzi.com.

]]> By: Kosso http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1436 Kosso Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:30:45 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-1436 I can read a newspaper or a book faster than it takes to watch a video, but I still like them all. Especially when they reference and connect to eachother's medium. Kosso I can read a newspaper or a book faster than it takes to watch a video, but I still like them all.

Especially when they reference and connect to eachother’s medium.

Kosso

]]> By: Shane Vitarana http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1435 Shane Vitarana Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:51:53 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-1435 The difference between text micro-blogging and video micro-blogging is that text can be scanned easily and processed very fast. That is why Twitter works. Voice and video require playing each one individually. You can't scan ahead and process it quickly. The difference between text micro-blogging and video micro-blogging is that text can be scanned easily and processed very fast. That is why Twitter works. Voice and video require playing each one individually. You can’t scan ahead and process it quickly.

]]> By: Kosso http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-7286 Kosso Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:30:45 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-7286 I can read a newspaper or a book faster than it takes to watch a video, but I still like them all.<br><br>Especially when they reference and connect to eachother's medium.<br><br>Kosso I can read a newspaper or a book faster than it takes to watch a video, but I still like them all.

Especially when they reference and connect to eachother's medium.

Kosso

]]> By: Mike Keliher http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-1437 Mike Keliher Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:15:26 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-1437 Your criticism of Seesmic - that "it takes way too long to post a video and listen to a video playback then read a maximum 140 character message" - seems to assume Seesmic is supposed to replace Twitter or somehow be "like Twitter but in video!" Sure, some people explain it like that because it's an easy way to explain what Seesmic is - roughly. But it's actually quite off the mark. There's a massive difference between interacting with people in short bursts of video and doing so in minuscule bursts of text. Comparing the two so directly isn't even like comparing apples and oranges - it's more like apples and cheeseburgers. Your criticism of Seesmic – that “it takes way too long to post a video and listen to a video playback then read a maximum 140 character message” – seems to assume Seesmic is supposed to replace Twitter or somehow be “like Twitter but in video!”

Sure, some people explain it like that because it’s an easy way to explain what Seesmic is – roughly. But it’s actually quite off the mark. There’s a massive difference between interacting with people in short bursts of video and doing so in minuscule bursts of text. Comparing the two so directly isn’t even like comparing apples and oranges – it’s more like apples and cheeseburgers.

]]> By: Shane Vitarana http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-7285 Shane Vitarana Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:51:53 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-7285 The difference between text micro-blogging and video micro-blogging is that text can be scanned easily and processed very fast. That is why Twitter works. Voice and video require playing each one individually. You can't scan ahead and process it quickly. The difference between text micro-blogging and video micro-blogging is that text can be scanned easily and processed very fast. That is why Twitter works. Voice and video require playing each one individually. You can't scan ahead and process it quickly.

]]> By: Mike Keliher http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-7284 Mike Keliher Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:15:26 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/04/does-video-twitter-make-sense/#comment-7284 Your criticism of Seesmic - that "it takes way too long to post a video and listen to a video playback then read a maximum 140 character message" - seems to assume Seesmic is supposed to replace Twitter or somehow be "like Twitter but in video!"<br><br>Sure, some people explain it like that because it's an easy way to explain what Seesmic is - roughly. But it's actually quite off the mark. There's a massive difference between interacting with people in short bursts of video and doing so in minuscule bursts of text. Comparing the two so directly isn't even like comparing apples and oranges - it's more like apples and cheeseburgers. Your criticism of Seesmic – that “it takes way too long to post a video and listen to a video playback then read a maximum 140 character message” – seems to assume Seesmic is supposed to replace Twitter or somehow be “like Twitter but in video!”

Sure, some people explain it like that because it's an easy way to explain what Seesmic is – roughly. But it's actually quite off the mark. There's a massive difference between interacting with people in short bursts of video and doing so in minuscule bursts of text. Comparing the two so directly isn't even like comparing apples and oranges – it's more like apples and cheeseburgers.

]]>