Comments on: Interview With Ann Bernard http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/interview-with-ann-bernard/ The Social Times covers news, analysis and insight pertaining to the social web. Learn how to brand yourself and your company via the social web. Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:14:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Avatar http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/interview-with-ann-bernard/#comment-559 Avatar Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:26:44 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/interview-with-ann-bernard/#comment-559 Good interview nick, glad to see a interview with Ann. :) Good interview nick, glad to see a interview with Ann. :)

]]> By: Avatar http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/interview-with-ann-bernard/#comment-4391 Avatar Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:26:44 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/interview-with-ann-bernard/#comment-4391 Good interview nick, glad to see a interview with Ann. :) Good interview nick, glad to see a interview with Ann. :)

]]> By: Bill Kocik http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/interview-with-ann-bernard/#comment-553 Bill Kocik Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:41:41 +0000 http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/interview-with-ann-bernard/#comment-553 I don't know that it was strictly necessary to mention in the write-up (yet again) your notion that WGS would best be used for dating; we all got that when we watched the interview and heard you mention it several times. I'm not sure why you felt compelled to call attention to it again in the write-up, unless you just had nothing else to say. But why would you call it a fact when it's clearly your opinion? You're re-defining what WGS has built, even though you were clearly told that's not what it is. Intentionally or not, you're implying that WGS has built yet another dating app, except that they don't even know they have. If it were my product, I think I'd be a little bit put off. -Bill I don’t know that it was strictly necessary to mention in the write-up (yet again) your notion that WGS would best be used for dating; we all got that when we watched the interview and heard you mention it several times. I’m not sure why you felt compelled to call attention to it again in the write-up, unless you just had nothing else to say. But why would you call it a fact when it’s clearly your opinion? You’re re-defining what WGS has built, even though you were clearly told that’s not what it is.

Intentionally or not, you’re implying that WGS has built yet another dating app, except that they don’t even know they have.

If it were my product, I think I’d be a little bit put off.

-Bill

]]>