<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Unleashes the Social Graph; It&#8217;s A Bunch of Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/google-unleashes-the-social-graph-its-a-bunch-of-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/google-unleashes-the-social-graph-its-a-bunch-of-theory/</link>
	<description>The Social Times covers news, analysis and insight pertaining to the social web.  Learn how to brand yourself and your company via the social web.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Search Graph API &#124; DotNeil.com</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/google-unleashes-the-social-graph-its-a-bunch-of-theory/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Graph API &#124; DotNeil.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/google-unleashes-the-social-graph-its-a-bunch-of-theory/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>[...] Social (Search) Graph API, the second stab at Facebook, is closer to the left-hook that Google wanted to throw in the first round. However, because they&#8217;d already made a misjudged move with OpenSocial, Social Graph API feels like a pretty desperate, second chance move to me, and I&#8217;m sure Nick O&#8217;Neill feels the same way. Google tackled the wrong problem with OpenSocial, they chose an inappropriate name for what is essentially a &#8216;universal widget wrapper&#8217;, and they should have just skipped the widget game entirely, saving all the momentum for Social Graph API. Relationships are the important part, not the trivial applications. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Social (Search) Graph API, the second stab at Facebook, is closer to the left-hook that Google wanted to throw in the first round. However, because they&#8217;d already made a misjudged move with OpenSocial, Social Graph API feels like a pretty desperate, second chance move to me, and I&#8217;m sure Nick O&#8217;Neill feels the same way. Google tackled the wrong problem with OpenSocial, they chose an inappropriate name for what is essentially a &#8216;universal widget wrapper&#8217;, and they should have just skipped the widget game entirely, saving all the momentum for Social Graph API. Relationships are the important part, not the trivial applications. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Perspective Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Consolidation Game: Google Enters with Social Graph API</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/google-unleashes-the-social-graph-its-a-bunch-of-theory/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Perspective Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Consolidation Game: Google Enters with Social Graph API</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/02/google-unleashes-the-social-graph-its-a-bunch-of-theory/#comment-463</guid>
		<description>[...] most efficient and disruptive mechanism for social sites and application we have seen. However, as Nick O&#8217;Neill points out, the numbers game don&#8217;t favor Google&#8217;s initiative: with over 70 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] most efficient and disruptive mechanism for social sites and application we have seen. However, as Nick O&#8217;Neill points out, the numbers game don&#8217;t favor Google&#8217;s initiative: with over 70 million [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
