<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zecco: Stock Trading Goes Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/zecco-stock-trading-goes-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/zecco-stock-trading-goes-social/</link>
	<description>The Social Times covers news, analysis and insight pertaining to the social web.  Learn how to brand yourself and your company via the social web.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/zecco-stock-trading-goes-social/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/zecco-stock-trading-goes-social/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Ehhh, I like the site and am a user but your comments are far, far too rosy.

They hood winked a lot of users by consistently scaling back their number of free trades and retroactively implementing a minimum balance requirement. That really hurt the small investors that had been taking advantage of their ill thought out business model. Frankly it was an embarrassing lack of foresight on their behalf by not anticipating the type of high volume, low balance investors that would become avid users.

That being said, I like the site quite a bit. They have enhanced a number of features and the community is growing. I was asked to become ac community rep and at the time declined, but since then the site has really improved in terms of organization and "cleanness."

The reality of the community isn't quite as great as you might think. The forums are somewhat useful but they lack the type of insight you can find at investors village, for example. The networking aspect should improve and I have interacted with others via the site and actually considered new trades based on their recommendations.

To summarize I like the company but I was very displeased with the consistent bait and switches they pulled on the community. If those are in the past I think they might have a future in an INCREDIBLY competitive industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehhh, I like the site and am a user but your comments are far, far too rosy.</p>
<p>They hood winked a lot of users by consistently scaling back their number of free trades and retroactively implementing a minimum balance requirement. That really hurt the small investors that had been taking advantage of their ill thought out business model. Frankly it was an embarrassing lack of foresight on their behalf by not anticipating the type of high volume, low balance investors that would become avid users.</p>
<p>That being said, I like the site quite a bit. They have enhanced a number of features and the community is growing. I was asked to become ac community rep and at the time declined, but since then the site has really improved in terms of organization and &#8220;cleanness.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reality of the community isn&#8217;t quite as great as you might think. The forums are somewhat useful but they lack the type of insight you can find at investors village, for example. The networking aspect should improve and I have interacted with others via the site and actually considered new trades based on their recommendations.</p>
<p>To summarize I like the company but I was very displeased with the consistent bait and switches they pulled on the community. If those are in the past I think they might have a future in an INCREDIBLY competitive industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/zecco-stock-trading-goes-social/#comment-5076</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/01/zecco-stock-trading-goes-social/#comment-5076</guid>
		<description>Ehhh, I like the site and am a user but your comments are far, far too rosy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They hood winked a lot of users by consistently scaling back their number of free trades and retroactively implementing a minimum balance requirement. That really hurt the small investors that had been taking advantage of their ill thought out business model. Frankly it was an embarrassing lack of foresight on their behalf by not anticipating the type of high volume, low balance investors that would become avid users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, I like the site quite a bit. They have enhanced a number of features and the community is growing. I was asked to become ac community rep and at the time declined, but since then the site has really improved in terms of organization and "cleanness."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reality of the community isn&#39;t quite as great as you might think. The forums are somewhat useful but they lack the type of insight you can find at investors village, for example. The networking aspect should improve and I have interacted with others via the site and actually considered new trades based on their recommendations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To summarize I like the company but I was very displeased with the consistent bait and switches they pulled on the community. If those are in the past I think they might have a future in an INCREDIBLY competitive industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehhh, I like the site and am a user but your comments are far, far too rosy.</p>
<p>They hood winked a lot of users by consistently scaling back their number of free trades and retroactively implementing a minimum balance requirement. That really hurt the small investors that had been taking advantage of their ill thought out business model. Frankly it was an embarrassing lack of foresight on their behalf by not anticipating the type of high volume, low balance investors that would become avid users.</p>
<p>That being said, I like the site quite a bit. They have enhanced a number of features and the community is growing. I was asked to become ac community rep and at the time declined, but since then the site has really improved in terms of organization and &#8220;cleanness.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reality of the community isn&#39;t quite as great as you might think. The forums are somewhat useful but they lack the type of insight you can find at investors village, for example. The networking aspect should improve and I have interacted with others via the site and actually considered new trades based on their recommendations.</p>
<p>To summarize I like the company but I was very displeased with the consistent bait and switches they pulled on the community. If those are in the past I think they might have a future in an INCREDIBLY competitive industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
