<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Social Web is Web 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:51:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>So far, OpenSocial is not about data portability - it is about portability of applications across social networking sites. Standardising the way apps communicate with those sites will help standardise the protocols used by the social graph, however. And as you suggest, sites supporting OpenSocial will be in a better position to make their data portable as the standard evolves to cover &#039;profile&#039; portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, OpenSocial is not about data portability &#8211; it is about portability of applications across social networking sites. Standardising the way apps communicate with those sites will help standardise the protocols used by the social graph, however. And as you suggest, sites supporting OpenSocial will be in a better position to make their data portable as the standard evolves to cover &#8216;profile&#8217; portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>So far, OpenSocial is not about data portability - it is about portability of applications across social networking sites. Standardising the way apps communicate with those sites will help standardise the protocols used by the social graph, however. And as you suggest, sites supporting OpenSocial will be in a better position to make their data portable as the standard evolves to cover &#039;profile&#039; portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, OpenSocial is not about data portability &#8211; it is about portability of applications across social networking sites. Standardising the way apps communicate with those sites will help standardise the protocols used by the social graph, however. And as you suggest, sites supporting OpenSocial will be in a better position to make their data portable as the standard evolves to cover &#39;profile&#39; portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/comment-page-1/#comment-8358</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtimes.com/2007/11/the-social-web-is-web-30/#comment-8358</guid>
		<description>So far, OpenSocial is not about data portability - it is about portability of applications across social networking sites. Standardising the way apps communicate with those sites will help standardise the protocols used by the social graph, however. And as you suggest, sites supporting OpenSocial will be in a better position to make their data portable as the standard evolves to cover &#039;profile&#039; portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, OpenSocial is not about data portability &#8211; it is about portability of applications across social networking sites. Standardising the way apps communicate with those sites will help standardise the protocols used by the social graph, however. And as you suggest, sites supporting OpenSocial will be in a better position to make their data portable as the standard evolves to cover &#39;profile&#39; portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
